Assessment and Feedback

“How learners are assessed shapes their understanding of the curriculum and determines their ability to progress” JISC, 2010, p.5

With increasing numbers of learners and practitioners engaging with technology it is an obvious step to examine how this could be harnessed for assessment and feedback. In fact, this is already taking place and throughout this resource you will find links to case studies and examples of how assessment and feedback has been supported by implementing technology. It is important to note that assessment is often thought of as either summative (assessment of learning) or formative (assessment for learning) and these terms will be used throughout this resource.

Formative assessment

The aim of formative assessment is to monitor the progress of student learning within a module and to generate feedback that can be used by lecturers to improve their teaching and by students to improve their learning. Formative assessment should be “low stakes” and designed to help students develop as learners by identifying strengths and weaknesses as a developmental process with no grade formally associated with the work. Specifically, formative assessment:

Examples of formative assessment include:

Summative assessment

The purpose of summative assessment is to evaluate the students’ learning, via established standards and assessment criteria, to determine whether and to what extent they have attained defined module learning outcomes. Summative assessment is inherently “high stakes”as outcomes are formally recorded and used to determine module, stage and programme outcomes in defined awards.  Summative assessment is subject to formal quality assurance processes relevant to the context of study.

Examples of summative assessment include:

Check out the following Ideas Factory post for more information: Assessment methods: an inventory of contemporary approaches.

Please note that full details of the University of Derby’s Academic Regulations governing assessment for undergraduate and postgraduate programmes can be accessed on the Academic Regulations website

Please also note we have guidance about acceptable practice regarding proofreading in the development of written work for summative assessment purposes

References

Ferrell, G (2013) Dialogue and change: an update on key themes from the JISC Assessment and Feedback programme

Ferrell, G (2012) A view of the Assessment and Feedback Landscape: baseline analysis of policy and practice from the JISC Assessment and Feedback programme.

https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/marked-improvement 

Effective Assessment in a Digital Age.